President
of The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
Dean
Spielmann
&
Minister
of Justice of the Czech republic
and
Member of Parliament
Helena
Válková
&
Ambassador
of the Czech republic in the European Council
Tomáš
Boček
Subject:
Notice
to the President of The European Court of Human Rights (Court in following) of the
corruption of the judge of The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg
E. Küris in the case of Cannabis and enforcement of the 3 following
requirements. Request directed to the Judge of the Court, to Minister of
Justice of the Czech republic and to the Ambassador of the Czech republic in
the European Council about the support in the case of enforcement of
application of the revocation in the decisions of the Court following according
to the articles numbers 31 and 41, point 5 of the rules of Procedure of the
Court and the enforcement of the article 39 of the rules of Procedure of the
Court.
Dear
Mr. President, dear Ms. Minister, dear Mr. Ambassador.
Before
one month there was a complaint number 1128/2014 from the lawyer of the
individual and artificial persons who have been participating in the
international research „Konopí je lék“ (Cannabis is The Cure) which was sent to
the Court by the Ambassador Tomáš Boček. The complaint was sent in 6th
February 2014 and it was about the behaviour of the judge E. Küris, who
rejected, without the explanation and with the link to the article 34 and 35 of
the rules of Procedure of the Court only, the complaint number 66981/12 in
which the legal admissibility had been processed one and half year.
There was a crime against humanity proved, also there was illegal prohibition
of the proceeding of this case at the European Court of Justice and many
other breaks of the Convention of the Human Rights from the side of the Czech
republic. The complaint didn´t agree with the decision number ÚS 664/12 of the
Constitutional Court of the Czech republic , as you can find here: http://nalus.usoud.cz/.
The complaint to the Court you can find here as the first one: http://echr-coe-int.blogspot.cz/.
The
single judge E. Küris outside the recommendation of the complainants number
1311/13 from the 9th January 2013 which link to the articles 34 and
35 of the rules of Procedure of the Court under the number 79490/13 from the 6th
February 2014 declined the legal admissibility of the two more decisions of the
Constitutional Court of the Czech republic numbers IV.ÚS 4859/12 and II. ÚS
1311/13 without the explanation.
In
the 3th July2014, under the number 47921/14, he declined to apply the article
39 (precaution) nevertheless it was proved that the articles 2 and 3 (and many
others) of the Convention of the Human Rights were broken by the Czech republic
in all the listed complaints, in the process of the fourth opposed decision of
the Constitutional Court number II.ÚS 289/14 and at the same time opposed
decision of the criminal Appeal of the High Court of the Czech republic number
Tpjn 301/2013, as you can find here http://cannainsider.eu/,
which was sent in the times of legality of the Cannabis growing without the
permission from the office according to the § 29 of the law of addictive drugs
(until 100 m2/person). Also there is long-standing ignoration of the Police,
prosecutor´s office and the courts to measure the ammount of THC in Cannabis
according to the law about the addictive drugs or at least according to the
legally binding European methodology, which leads to increasing of the ammout
of THC 100 times by the Police, so the citizens are criminalized. With the
knowledge that Police doesn´t have any methodology of measuring THC in Cannabis
which would be proved by law until now (the article 39 of the Convention
breaking) in 13th March 2014 the judge decided, that it is the crime
to own 10 grams
of Cannabis flos. It was repeatedly proved to the Court, that the Czech
republic would like to destroy the research of Konopí je lék (Cannabis is The
Cure) and it wants to commit a crime againt humanity again. It was proved to
the Court, that also the Police presidents, the judges of different Courts of
the judge systém, and also attorney Pavel Zeman were included into this serious
crime, with the knowledge of abusing the international obligations and the law
of the Czech republic, as it can be proved here:http://pavel-zeman.blogspot.cz/
It
was proved to the Court, that all the prosecutor´s offices forbid to
investigate these crimes against humanity and also up to 90% weight loss of the
Cannabis confiscated (not only) from the research farm in Ospělov and also
highest prosecutor´s office refused to command the Police to apply § 12,
subsection 2, 28 and 31, article 1 of the Criminal Code to enforce the
registration of the Cannabis growers up to 100m2/person at least at the local
authority.
In
the 21st July 2014 the lawyer of the decision opposed from the
Constitutional Court of the Czech republic in the case of Growshop versus Czech
republic number III. ÚS 934/13 and also of the opposed decision of the
criminal senate of the High Court of the Czech republic number Tpjn 301/2013,
got the decision of the single judge E.Küris from the date 9th
July.2014, which has been again the general demonstration of the article 34 and
35 only. The judge declined legal admissibility of the listed complaint under
the number 41264/14, in which there was proved, that the Constitutional Court
didn´t have any evidence about the alleged spread of drug addiction by the
complainant with the usage of the literature which can be found in Growshop,
about the advices and the seeds of Cannabis selling, there was no proof
of the harmful effects, the judges didn´t have the same opinion, personal,
family and social life of the complainant was devastated totally and there was
material damage bigger than 1 million Czech crowns. The coplainants has been
living in material poverty, even though he didn´t make any harms to anyone, as
it is opposite and he behaved in the intention of the explanatory memorandum in
the paragrapg of the spread of drug addiction and he used the principles of
harm reduction, as well as he was forced by the law to inform the customers of
the growshop properly.
Dear
Mr. President, dear Ms. Minister, dear Mr. Ambassador.
It
is the legal obligation of the courts to justify their decision properly,
especially when the citizens ask the highest Court possible, as the European
Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg is, for the solution coming out from the
law, when their rights were broken by their own state, which acted against the
citizens as it would be organized criminal group.
As
an addictologist I know very well Cannabis is very sensitive topic, even though
it is not possible to close the eyes to not see the crimes against humanity
made by the legal authorities and to not see enormous justice corruption made
(not only) in the Czech republic in this case, but as you can see above, also
by European Court of Human Rights. Because of that I would like to link you to
the point 2 of the complaint number 47921/2014 which can be found here: http://cannainsider.eu/.
This complaint is, as it was informed after the prohibition of the application
of the article 39 in
the 16th July 2014,
in the proceeding of the Court (there were labels with
the code number 47921/2014 extraordinarily sent ) and until
now there was no previous complaint declined as it would be admissible, when it
is legally permissible as the complaints listed above.
I
would like to ask you kindly to support – according to your competition:
1)
disciplinary proceeding with the single judge E.Küris
2)
the application of the revocation of the all decisions of the Court listed
above
3)
Proceeding of the complaint number 47921/2014 according to the article 39 of
the rules of procedure of the Court, because it was proved by the doctors and
the expert witnesses that there was article 2 and 3 of the Convention of the
Human Rights breaking by the Czech republic and the Czech republic wants to
make the crimes against humanity repeatedly.
In
the case I will not get your decision during 14 days, we will také the case of
the corrupted single judge E.Küris to the Interpol and we will appropriately
medialize this case not only in Czech language, considering the investment of
(not only) the Europeans and European union, we will also give a stimulus to
the Police organ OLAF.
I
expect, that Czech republic will be fast in adoption of our justifiable
requirements which can be found here: http://www.konopijelek.cz/,
because the Czech republic allowed getting, proceeding and distribution of
Cannabis without the limitation of the THC ammount without any permission from
the offices until the 1st April 2013, as it was for the research and
industrial purposes (as it is written in the not-notificated change of §5,
article 5 of the law about addictive drugs and from the same date other
products of Cannabis than the Cannabis flos forbiden to the citizens and also
the prohibition of the really needed research of the healing content in
Cannabis according to the § 24 b of the law about addictive drugs and according
to the not-notificated law number 50/2013 Sb. which is named after Orwell as
the law „Konopí do lékáren“ (Cannabis to the pharmacies). As it is known by the
Court from the complaint number 47921/2014, tender of the Czech republic
from the May of the same year was directed to the 100 rich people of Czech
republic, but it is more set for the people who like enchanment, because the
Czech republic stated the tender for the high percentage of THC (19%), but the
main healing cannabinoid CBD can be found in the minimal potent Cannabis
flos, so the healing effects of Cannabis are minimalized knowingly.
Thanks
a ot for your attention.
With
the respect and expectation of your decision
Dušan
Dvořák, the director of the research Konopí je lék (Cannabis is The Cure)
Dušan
Dvořák is the chairman of the board of the international non-profit
organisation AK Diag Human Cannabis, IN: 266 70 232, which is the member of
international association Open Royal Academy, which is from the date 6th
January 2014 stated as a lawyer of the individual and artificial persons in the
international research Konopí je lék (Cannabis is The Cure) included . Dušan
Dvořák is also the solicitor of the complainant in the process held at the
European Court of Human Rights in the case of Growshop versus the Czech
republic.
Phone:
+ 420 774 723 261, email: dusan.dvorak@konopijelek.cz
From:
Medical Cannabis Social Club <dusan.dvorak@konopijelek.cz>
Date: 2014-07-25 20:07
Subject: Cannabis
To: DGI-execution@coe.int, private.office@coe.int, posta@msp.justice.cz, Helena Válková <valkovah@psp.cz>, coe.strasbourg@embassy.mzv.cz, tomas_bocek@mzv.cz
Date: 2014-07-25 20:07
Subject: Cannabis
To: DGI-execution@coe.int, private.office@coe.int, posta@msp.justice.cz, Helena Válková <valkovah@psp.cz>, coe.strasbourg@embassy.mzv.cz, tomas_bocek@mzv.cz
K reakci
České republiky
(upozornění bylo dne 22.7.2014 zasláno v češtině
ministryni spravedlnosti)
Vážená paní ministryně
Obdržel
jsem níže uvedené sdělení pana vládního zmocněnce JUDr. Víta Schorma, děkuji.
Sdělte mi prosím termín srpnové schůzky.
Není přece možné zavírat oči před tak okatou
justiční korupcí, která sahá až k Evropskému soudu pro lidská práva, když jsme
doložili důkazy porušení čl. 2 a
3 Úmluvy o lidských právech a dalších čl. Úmluvy a jak je doloženo v stížnosti
na porušení práva Společenství pro Evropskou komisi zde http://cannabis-is-the-cure.
Pokud stížnosti - bez jakéhokoliv
zdůvodnění namítaných porušení závazků ČR - zamítne 4x Ústavní soud a totéž
učiní ESLP a stížnosti splnily všechny požadovaná kriteria a formální
náležitosti, pak zřejmě něco není v pořádku.
Podmínky
vládě jsme zveřejnili na titulní straně www.konopijelek.cz
Téma schůzky je jen a jen justice a SZ - věc je řešitelná i bez
změny legislativy, návrh jsme podali (opět bez jakéhokoliv zájmu a reakce) všem
předsedům parlamentních stran již 17.listopadu 2013 a je doložen zde http://konopi2014.blogspot.cz/
a jde aplikovat i v urgentním režimu, který bych raději projednal osobně a
pokud tak svolíte, i za přítomnosti mých kolegů.
30.7.2014
Děkuji
Vám předem za Vaše vyjádření
Přeji vám hezký den, pevné zdraví a stálou pohodu
Dušan Dvořák, MMCA
Dušan Dvořák, MMCA
PS.
Věc
týkající se pouze výzkumu Konopí je lék je řešitelná i z pozice MSp podáním
podnětu NS ČR pro porušení zákona (žádáno cca 100 občany a nevládními
organizacemi již v roce 2012, letos opětovně s novými důkazy!) vůči Dušanu
Dvořákovi v kauzách řešených vždy stejnou soudkyní Mgr. Ilonou Otrubovou u OS v
Prostějově pod. sp. zn. 2 T 104/2010, 2 Nt1257/2013, 0Nt 820/2011
Nechci
polemizovat s panem zmocněncem, jen si myslím, že ČR by měla vždy trvat na tom,
aby jakákoliv soudní instituce své rozhodnutí řádně zdůvodnila a
rozhodnutí učinila na základě důkazů, ESLP rovněž finančně podporujeme a je
dobré, aby tento soud dával nejen ČR reflexi, vždyť Úmluva je hlavním pramenem
civilizovaného práva a naší ústavy
Dne
30. července 2014 18:19 Schorm Vít JUDr. <VSchorm@msp.justice.cz>
napsal(a):
Vážený pane,
ministryně spravedlnosti
obdržela Vaše podání doručené dne 22. července 2014, zapsané v naší
evidenci pod č. j. MSP-5/2014-KVZ-SP/2
, avšak primárně adresované předsedovi Evropského soudu pro lidská práva.
Dovolte mi, abych Vás
vyrozuměl, že do dané záležitosti týkající se stížností podaných
k uvedenému soudu nemůže Ministerstvo spravedlnosti žádným způsobem
zasahovat, neboť Evropský soud pro lidská práva je nezávislý orgán, a to
především na smluvních státech Evropské úmluvy o lidských právech. Další postup
ohledně Vašeho podání závisí čistě na něm. Ministerstvo spravedlnosti nadto
nemá důvod se věcí zabývat ani jiným způsobem, neboť žádná ze stížností, které
ve svém podání zmiňujete, nebyla žalované České republice oznámena; všechny
byly, jak se zdá, odmítnuty pro nesplnění podmínek přijatelnosti a tato konečná
rozhodnutí nám nepřísluší komentovat.
Věřím, že tuto zprávu
přijmete s pochopením a nebudete nadále po České republice, žalované
v těchto stížnostech, požadovat nějaké kroky za situace, kdy není
k žádným krokům oprávněna.
S pozdravem
JUDr. Vít A. Schorm
vládní zmocněnec pro zastupování České republiky před Evropským soudem pro lidská práva
Ministerstvo spravedlnosti
Vyšehradská 16, CZ – 128 10 PRAHA
pracoviště Na Děkance 3, PRAHA
tel.: +420 221 997 442
fax: +420 221 997 445
e-mail: kvz@msp.justice.cz
web: www.justice.cz
vládní zmocněnec pro zastupování České republiky před Evropským soudem pro lidská práva
Ministerstvo spravedlnosti
Vyšehradská 16, CZ – 128 10 PRAHA
pracoviště Na Děkance 3, PRAHA
tel.: +420 221 997 442
fax: +420 221 997 445
e-mail: kvz@msp.justice.cz
web: www.justice.cz
